Indexado em
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • Chaves Acadêmicas
  • JournalTOCs
  • Infraestrutura Nacional de Conhecimento da China (CNKI)
  • Acesso à pesquisa on-line global em agricultura (AGORA)
  • Centro Internacional de Agricultura e Biociências (CABI)
  • RefSeek
  • Diretório de Indexação de Periódicos de Pesquisa (DRJI)
  • Universidade de Hamdard
  • EBSCO AZ
  • OCLC- WorldCat
  • Scholarsteer
  • Catálogo online SWB
  • publons
  • Euro Pub
  • Google Scholar
Compartilhe esta página
Folheto de jornal
Flyer image

Abstrato

Effect of Different Chemical Preservatives on Preservation of Pear Nectar

Qamar Liaqat, Said Wahab, Muhammad Ayub, Adnan Waheed, Irfan Ullah, Naeem Ullah, Murtaza Ali

Benzoate and Potassium sorbate separately and in combination with different concentration is used for the preservation of pear nectar. The samples were packed in 250 ml transparent plastic bottles at room temperature for a storage period of 90 days. The treatments were P0 (pear nectar with no preservative), P1 (pear nectar+0.1% Sodium benzoate), P2 (pear nectar+0.1% potassium sorbate), P3 (pear nectar+0.05% Sodium benzoate), P4 (pear nectar+ 0.05% Potassium benzoate) and P5 (pear nectar+0.05% Sodium benzoate and 0.05% Potassium sorbate). Samples of pear nectar were evaluated for total soluble solids, ascorbic acid, %acidity, pH, reducing and non-reducing sugar and sensory evaluation (color, flavor, taste and overall acceptability). pH decrease from 4.03 to 3.60, total soluble solids increase (14.90 to 16.03)%, acidity 0.93 to 1.02, ascorbic acid decrease 7.04 to 5.15, reducing sugar increase 18.03 to 18.28, non-reducing sugar decrease 3.88 to 3.40, color decrease 8.10 to 5.57, flavor 8.20 to 5.75, taste 8.10 to 5.60 and overall acceptability decreased 7.18 to 5.02 during period of storage. The results show that the storage period and treatments had a significant effect (p<0.05) on physicochemical and sensory evaluation of pear nectar. The nectar sample P5 was found best followed by P1, while P0 shows the poor results.