Indexado em
  • Banco de Dados de Periódicos Acadêmicos
  • Abra o Portão J
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • Chaves Acadêmicas
  • JournalTOCs
  • Infraestrutura Nacional de Conhecimento da China (CNKI)
  • CiteFactor
  • Scimago
  • Diretório de Periódicos de Ulrich
  • Biblioteca de periódicos eletrônicos
  • RefSeek
  • Universidade de Hamdard
  • EBSCO AZ
  • OCLC- WorldCat
  • Catálogo online SWB
  • Biblioteca Virtual de Biologia (vifabio)
  • publons
  • MIAR
  • Comissão de Bolsas Universitárias
  • Fundação de Genebra para Educação e Pesquisa Médica
  • Euro Pub
  • Google Scholar
Compartilhe esta página
Folheto de jornal
Flyer image

Abstrato

Quantitative Evaluation of Bioequivalence/Biosimilarity

Shein-Chung Chow

As more biologic products are going off patent protection, the development of follow-on biologics (biosimilars) products has received much attention from both biotechnology industry and the regulatory agencies. Unlike traditional small-molecule (chemical) drug products, the development of biologic products is very different and variable with respect to the manufacturing process and environment. The complexity and heterogeneity of the molecular structure, complicated manufacturing process, different analytical methods, and possibility of severe immunogenicity reactions make quantitative evaluation of follow-on biologics a great challenge to both scientific community and regulatory agencies. In this article, an overview of current criteria, study design, and statistical methods for quantitative evaluation of bioequivalence for the traditional small molecule generic drug productsand biosimilarity for biosimilars products is provided. In addition, a general approach for development of a biosimilarity index based on the concept of reproducibility probability for quantitative evaluation of bioequivalence/biosimilarity is proposed. Some scientific factors and practical issues are also discussed.

Isenção de responsabilidade: Este resumo foi traduzido usando ferramentas de inteligência artificial e ainda não foi revisado ou verificado