Indexado em
  • Abra o Portão J
  • Genamics JournalSeek
  • Chaves Acadêmicas
  • Bíblia de pesquisa
  • cosmos SE
  • Acesso à pesquisa on-line global em agricultura (AGORA)
  • Biblioteca de periódicos eletrônicos
  • RefSeek
  • Diretório de Indexação de Periódicos de Pesquisa (DRJI)
  • Universidade de Hamdard
  • EBSCO AZ
  • OCLC- WorldCat
  • Scholarsteer
  • Catálogo online SWB
  • Biblioteca Virtual de Biologia (vifabio)
  • publons
  • Fundação de Genebra para Educação e Pesquisa Médica
  • Euro Pub
  • Google Scholar
Compartilhe esta página
Folheto de jornal
Flyer image

Abstrato

Comparison of Univariate and Multivariate Models to Analyze Stability of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Genotypes in Ethiopia

Demelash Bassa, Fekadu Gurmu and Hussein Mohammed

Data of sixteen Andean red common bean genotypes were evaluated across six environments using seven univariate and two multivariate models to study Genotype by Environment Interaction (GEI) and stability in Ethiopia. There was significant (P<0.01) genotype, environment and GEI that necessitated estimation of the stability of the genotypes. According to the multivariate analysis of Additive Main Effects and Multiplicative (AMMI), Red kidney, DAB 478 and Melkadima were stable. According to Genotype plus Genotype by Environment (GGE) interaction bi-plot analysis, DAB 544, Red kidney, DAB 478, DAB 532 and DAB 478 were found stable. The univariate models identified stable genotypes DAB 478 and DAB 544 in common whereas the multivariate models AMMI and GGE identified best performing and stable genotypes Red kidney and DAB 478 across the six test environments. Therefore, one of the five univariate models except Lin and Binn’s cultivar performance measure and coefficient of determination and one of the two multivariate models can be used for stability study of common bean in Ethiopia.

Isenção de responsabilidade: Este resumo foi traduzido usando ferramentas de inteligência artificial e ainda não foi revisado ou verificado